Second, the healing points don’t overlap as they do in Lightroom, making finer adjustments easier. First, it simply is quicker Lightroom can lag significantly when you heal large areas of an image, while it is a relatively quick process with Capture One. Big win for Capture One.Ĭapture One’s built-in healing layer adjustment is better than Lightroom’s spot heal brush for a number of reasons. It’s also much easier to toggle the adjustments on and off, saving you quite a bit of time at this stage. Lastly, the layer system lets you change the opacity of your local adjustments if you realize you want to tone them down. That’s much better than in Lightroom, which only has a slightly expanded Basics panel to work with. One top of that, far more adjustments are possible with Capture One’s layers than Lightroom’s local edits, including nearly every adjustment that you can make to the base layer itself. It still works like a charm in photos where I’ve added a dozen layers or more. Lightroom starts to lag a lot once you add a handful of local adjustments, while Capture One hardly slows down at all. Instead, Lightroom has adjustment points for brushes or gradients, which isn’t really the same.įirst, Capture One still lets you do brushes and gradients (as part of layer masks), but their implementation isn’t nearly as slow. Or, you can buy a standalone version of Capture One for $300, then upgrade if you want a future version for $120.Įither way, Capture One works out to be more expensive in the long run, unless you buy the standalone and rarely or never upgrade to the newest version. Then again, you might prefer to buy from a company that has a standalone option simply because it’s easier to switch if they go a direction you don’t like – and upgrade only when you feel that it is worth the money.Ĭapture One has layers! This has been one of the most requested features in Lightroom for ages, although it seems unlikely at this point to appear. If you prepay for a yearly subscription of Capture One, it’s $180, working out to $15/month. Adobe charges an added $10/month for every terabyte of images you store on their cloud, although most photographers just keep images locally instead.įor most users, Capture One is more expensive. That bundle also comes with Photoshop CC. Both are sold as part of Adobe’s subscription model for $10/month. There are two versions of Lightroom today, CC and Classic (see: what’s the difference?). Still, this is a win for Lightroom, and one that makes a difference to some users. And chances are good that your lens has a profile in both software packages without issue. This isn’t a big deal to most users, since almost every camera out there gets Capture One’s support in the end (including medium format cameras from other brands, although that’s a new development). Instead, both programs have very similar feature sets for organization overall. This surprised me it seems common knowledge in the photography community that Lightroom is better for organization, but aside from the face detection and automatic keywording, that doesn’t appear to be true. You can use Capture One’s “filter > search” tool to sort through your images by a wide range of criteria, akin to Lightroom’s filter bar. Although this feature is only in Lightroom CC, while most photographers are likely using Lightroom Classic, this keyword tool has a lot of potential to be the organizational system of the future.Īside from those shiny new features, the two programs are similar. The same is true of Lightroom CC’s automatic artificial intelligence keywording. Specifically, Lightroom’s face detection feature is very useful for event photographers, sorting photos of people with impressive accuracy. Organizing PhotosĪssuming you’re using the newest version, Lightroom has some useful features for organizing your photos that don’t appear in Capture One. Switching from Lightroom to Capture Oneġ.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |